Jump to Body Text

search | site index | faq | about us | what's new

Minnesota Center Against Violence and Abuse

Detecting the Potential for Violence

Jane F. Gilgun, Ph.D., LICSW
University of Minnesota

Publication Date: 1999


Table of Contents


Introduction

When anyone--child, teenager, adult--threatens to commit violence, the threats must be taken seriously. People, young or old, sometimes make threats in the heat of the moment. Later, they want to take the threats back. Other times, danger is at hand. What is the difference between a threat that is likely to be acted on and a threat that is not?

Return to top of the page


A Precipitating Event

Youths who have shown a pattern of direct statements and a pattern of behaviors suggesting the possibility of their being violent, often act out the violence following an event they find highly stressful. Examples include Kip Kinkel, who killed his parents and two classmates, and wounded 22 others told a classmate the day before the killings that he wanted to get back at the people who had expelled him from school. He was expelled for having a loaded pistol in his locker. Andrew Golden, 13, who murdered a teacher and classmates in Jonesboro, AK, had been rejected by a girl on whom he had a crush.

Return to top of the page


Patterns of Direct Statements

Direct statements about committing violence are red flags. When youth have made statements more than once, to several different people, and in different contexts (e.g., home, schoolyard, classroom, neighborhood), the danger is increased. Sometimes youth are just blowing off steam, do not have a pattern of invoking violence, and are not at risk, but to know this, the following assessments must be made.

Verbal Statements

Verbal statements include talking about harming/killing others, idolizing violent heroes, and providing specific details of how the violence will take place, including who the intended victims are, and when and where the violent events are to take place.

Written statements

Writing poems and stories about killing people could be a warning sign in combination with other indicators. The more often youth does this and the variety of places in which such writings are shared may increase the likelihood of violence.

Return to top of the page


Circumstances that Increase the Likelihood of Violence

One or more of the following increases the likelihood of acting out the talk.

  1. Preoccupation with violence
  2. Means to commit the violence
  3. Patterns of bullying and being bullied
  4. Psychological vulnerability
  5. Part of a group of youth who are preoccupied with violence
  6. History of violence in the families of origin
  7. A Pattern of glorifying violence
  8. A sense of entitlement

Return to top of the page


Indirect Indicators: Signs of Cumulative Stress

Indirect indicators increase the likelihood of youth acting out violently, but by themselves they are indicators of serious issues that indicate the youth need intervention. If the direct communication is not present, the likelihood of violence is diminished. If direct communication of violence and these signs of cumulative stress are present, then the likelihood of violence is increased.

  1. Emotionally closed
  2. Shame, feeling defective
  3. Unshared anger and grief
  4. Anti-social behaviors
  5. Chemical abuse
  6. Self-injurious behaviors
  7. Signs of Cumulative Stress

Return to top of the page


Indicators That the Youth has a Lowered Risk for Violence

The following factors diminish the likelihood that a youth will act out a verbal threat. The more negative factors that a youth has, however, and the fewer positive factors, such as those listed below, the more likely it is that violence will take place.

  1. Emotional expressiveness
  2. Empathy for others
  3. Good interpersonal skills
  4. Spends time with friends who are pro-social
  5. Sense of humor
  6. Optimistic about the future
  7. Has a close relationship with at least one parent
  8. Close relationships with adults other than parents
  9. Willingness to negotiate

Return to top of the page


Summary

In detecting potential for violence, these positive factors must be looked for as well as the negative factors. When the negatives outweigh the positives, the situation is serious. One or two negative factors in combination with many positives might indicate a child who is blowing off steam and is not a threat. A few negative factors and no positive factors could indicate a problem and require some helpful interventions.

Return to top of the page


About the Author

Jane Gilgun is a professor at the School of Social Work, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. Phone: 612/925-3569; e-mail: jgilgun@tc.umn.edu. Her research areas are how persons overcome adversities, the development of violent behaviors, and the meanings of violence to perpetrators. She is planning a book entitled In Their Own Words: Men Talk About Their Violence.

Return to top of the page

The following projects are a part of the Minnesota Center Against Violence and Abuse (MINCAVA):

MINCAVA Electronic Clearinghouse | The Link Research Project | Violence Against Women Online Resources
VAWnet (Applied Research Forum) | Minnesota Rural Project for Women and Child Safety

MINCAVA is directed by Jeffrey L. Edleson, PhD.

File Last Modified: 42. Copyright © 1995 - 2005 Minnesota Center Against Violence and Abuse